Manuscript Evaluation Criteria
Submissions will be evaluated according to their interdisciplinary scope, scientific merits, and technical quality on a scale of excellent, very good, good and fair.
Access Review, Peer-Review & Interactive Public Discussion (ESDD)
Manuscripts submitted to ESD at first undergo a rapid access review by the editor (initial manuscript evaluation), which is not meant to be a full scientific review but to identify and sort out manuscripts with obvious major deficiencies in view of the above principal evaluation criteria.
If they are not immediately rejected, they will be published on the Earth System Dynamics Discussions (ESDD) website, the discussion forum of ESD, where they are subject to full peer-review and Interactive Public Discussion.
In the full review and interactive discussion the referees and other interested members of the scientific community are asked to take into account all of the following aspects:
Peer-Review Completion (ESD)
At the end of the Interactive Public Discussion, the authors may make their final response and submit a revised manuscript. Based on the Referee Comments, other relevant comments, and the authors' response in the public discussion, the revised manuscript is re-evaluated and rated by the editor. If rated 1-2 (excellent-good) in all of the principal criteria and specific aspects listed above, it will normally be accepted for publication in ESD. Additional advice from the referees in the evaluation and rating of the revised manuscript will be requested by the editor if the public discussion in ESDD is not sufficiently conclusive.